SCOTUS issues important decision concerning patent lawsuits - II

Last week, our blog spent some time discussing how a 1990 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding where patent infringement actions may be filed has now resulted in a flood of lawsuits -- many of them dubious in nature -- in jurisdictions known for being sympathetic to plaintiffs.

We'll continue this discussion in today's post, examining how the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands has essentially ended this practice of forum shopping in patent litigation.

The case revolved around Heartland's production of liquid water flavoring or enhancers, which Kraft alleged infringed on a patent it held for its own line of liquid water enhancers.

Kraft filed the patent infringement lawsuit in the federal court in Delaware, but Heartland attempted to have it transferred to Indiana, the location of its corporate headquarters, arguing that 98 percent of its sales occurred outside Delaware and that it had no corporate presence there.

These arguments proved unavailing, however, with the federal court in Delaware denying the transfer based on the aforementioned 1990 decision and the Federal Circuit affirming.

The matter ultimately came before the U.S. Supreme Court, which unanimously reversed last week, holding that a potentially determinative decision it handed down back in 1957 had not been subsequently altered by Congress or the courts, and was therefore still controlling.

This 1957 decision held that patent infringement lawsuits can only be filed where a defendant actually resides, which in the case of corporations, is their state of incorporation. In other words, the lawsuit against Heartland had to proceed in Indiana.

As we stated earlier, the ruling has been hailed by both major corporations and legal experts, who assert that it will help stem the number of lawsuits filed by patent trolls, who will likely see their abilities to prevail severely compromised.

"[SCOTUS' decision] deals a severe blow to non-practicing entities or ‘patent trolls,’ and shifts home court advantage to companies accused of patent infringement,” said one intellectual property specialist.

It will be interesting to see what transpires going forward …

Consider speaking with an experienced legal professional if you have questions or concerns relating to intellectual property.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Set up an Initial Consultation »

Need Our Help?

Contact us today to set up an initial consultation with an attorney in Truckee, Sacramento, Reno, Tahoe City, South Lake Tahoe/Zephyr Cove, or Incline Village/Crystal Bay. We can be reached at 530-214-0385. Or send us an email.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Office Locations – For an Appointment, Call 530-214-0385

Truckee Office
10280 Donner Pass Road
Truckee, CA 96161

Phone: 530-214-0385
Fax: 530-214-8158
Truckee Law Office Map

Sacramento Office
1830 15th Street
Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95811

Phone: 530-214-0385
Fax: 916-848-3500
Map & Directions

Reno Office
527 S. Arlington Avenue
Reno, NV 89509

Phone: 530-214-0385
Fax: 775-201-1444
Map & Directions

South Lake Tahoe/Zephyr Cove
212 Elks Point Road
Suite 553
Zephyr Cove, NV 89448

Phone: 530-214-0385
Fax: 775-201-1444
Map & Directions

Incline Village/Crystal Bay
22 State Highway 28
Crystal Bay, NV 89402

Fax: 775-201-1444
Map & Directions

Truckee High Street Office
10343 High Street
Suite One
Truckee, CA 96161

Fax: 530-587-0707
Map & Directions

Chico Office
2585 Ceanothus Avenue
Suite 178
Chico, CA 95973

Phone: 530-214-0385
Fax: 530-267-3933
Map & Directions